MERC Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Classification Order (Case No. 230, 231, 232, 233, 154 & 174 of 2025)
MERC order dated 4 May 2026 in Case 230, 231, 232, 233, 154 & 174 of 2025: a 37-page classification order for Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.. Full section index with printed page numbers, key facts, and a link to the official order.
Key facts
- Issuing authority
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC)
- Case number
- 230, 231, 232, 233, 154 & 174 of 2025
- Order date
- 4 May 2026
- Petitioner
- Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL)
- Entity
- Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL)
- Order type
- Classification Order
- Control period
- —
- Tariff regime
- —
- Act sections cited
- s.56, s.61, s.62, s.86
- Licensee segment
- distribution
- Asset segment
- distribution
- State
- Maharashtra
- Length
- 37 pages
About this order
A classification order decides which tariff category applies to a consumer or class of consumers, interpreting the tariff schedule set in the underlying tariff order.
This order was issued by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, the electricity regulator for Maharashtra. The section index below is extracted from the order’s own structure; page numbers refer to the printed page in the official PDF.
Section index
- para 3 Petitioners' main prayers are as follows: p. 3
para 4 Petitioner, MSEDCL in its Petitions has stated as follows: 4 sections · p. 4
- para 4.9 In Case No. 230 of 2025 p. 7
- para 4.10 In Case No. 231 of 2025 p. 7
- para 4.11 In Case No. 232 of 2025 p. 7
- para 4.12 In Case No. 233 of 2025 p. 8
- para 5 Respondent UTCL in its Reply dated 30 December 2025 and in submission dated 5 January 2026 has stated as follows: p. 12
- para 7 Petitioners (BCCIL & ACL) in their Petitions in Case No 154 of 2025 & 174 of 2025 have stated as follows: p. 19
- para 8 Adani Agri Logistics Ltd in its submission in IA No. 18 of 2026 dated 30 January, 2026 has submitted as under: p. 19
- para 12 MSEDCL, in its common submission in Case No. 230 of 2025, 231 of 2025, 232 of 2025, 254 of 2025, & 174 of 2025, dated 06 January 2026, has stated as below: p. 24
- para 13 MSEDCL, in its submission in Case No. 233 of 2025, dated 06 January 2026, has stated as below (MSEDCL has made a mostly similar submission in other cases at the above para, which is not reproduced for the sake of brevity): p. 26
- para 25 Issue (A) Ascertainment of tariff category applicable to 'Bulk Cement Terminal' & 'Grain processing and packaging plants' and whether 'Bulk Cement Terminal' & 'Grain processing and packaging plants' can be re-classified retrospectively? p. 31
- para 26 Issue (B) Whether MSEDCL is entitled to recovery on account of such retrospective reclassification? p. 34
- para 27 Hence, the following Order. p. 35
Index extracted from the official order. Page numbers are the printed page in the PDF; front-matter (table of contents, abbreviations) is not indexed.
Ask CtrlPeriod about this order
- What did MERC decide in Case 230, 231, 232, 233, 154 & 174 of 2025? →
- Summarise the key determinations in MSEDCL’s Classification Order. →
- What directions did MERC issue to MSEDCL in this order? →
Related orders
- MSEDCL Tariff Adoption Order (Case 142 & 190 of 2025) page pending
- MSEDCL Tariff Adoption Order (Case 155 of 2024) page pending
- MSEDCL Tariff Adoption Order (Case 156 of 2024) page pending
- MSEDCL Tariff Adoption Order (Case 173 of 2024) page pending
- MSEDCL Tariff Adoption Order (Case 240 of 2024) page pending
- MSEDCL Tariff Adoption Order (Case 246 of 2025) page pending
- MSEDCL Tariff Adoption Order (Case 82 of 2026) page pending
- MSEDCL Classification Order (Case 77 of 2025) page pending
- MSEDCL Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) Order (Case 217 of 2024)
About this page
Official order PDF (MERC) · 37 pages.
Case details, dates and the section index on this page are extracted directly from the official order published by MERC. This page was assembled by CtrlPeriod Research using automated document analysis; it does not reproduce the order’s determined tariff figures. It is a research aid, not legal or financial advice — verify against the official order before relying on it.